The
Adventure of Sherlock Holmes’ Smarter Brother
Precisely, and that is part of the joke, the film to be expected
from the original author of Young Frankenstein. “Holy
Jesus Christ,” exclaims Dr. Watson, the original Robin.
Halliwell has a way of dismissing a certain type of film as
something Hitchcock wouldn’t touch, and that’s what this is, a case
fobbed off by Sherlock onto Sigerson and not directed by Mel Brooks (admirers
of his To Be or Not to Be will note the
choreography by Alan Johnson), at all events a stratagem. The
MacGuffin is a blue-ribbon document presented by Queen Victoria to her Foreign
Secretary, a widower engaged to his children’s governess, a talented
young lady blackmailed by Signor Gambetti the opera
impresario (The Masked Ball in
English is his latest, cf. Nicolas
Roeg’s contribution to Aria),
Professor Moriarty has bidders for the dingus, a rolled-up bit of writing to
prevent “a devastating war”. A simple question
of the lady’s affections, “the fate of England” and so forth.
Vincent Canby of the New
York Times, “an impressive debut as a comedy director.” Variety, “in
that elusive pantheon of madcap humor.” Pauline Kael (The New Yorker),
“has mouth-watering possibilities, but they aren’t developed.” Time Out, “hit
and miss.” Dave Kehr (Chicago Reader), “amateurish”. TV Guide, “a
portrait of delightful mayhem.” Catholic News
Service Media Review Office, “morally offensive... spectacularly tasteless visuals, double
entendres and a love scene that goes beyond comic intentions.”
Halliwell’s Film Guide, “infuriating”,
citing Howard Kissel (Women’s Wear Daily), “the kind of numbers actors like
to do at parties,” John Simon, “more than he can chew or I can swallow”,
Sight and Sound, “stray
chuckles”, and Kael again, “there’s
no mystery.”
The World’s
Greatest Lover
Imperishable scenes attended by Carl Ballantine, as though
vaudeville could be nonplussed. Fellini with a bit of
flavor, not out of Cinecittà but Hollywoodland.
The real tribute is to Alberto Sordi, of course, a truly great
progenitor.
The Woman in Red
The particular demon invading the peace of Ted Pierce’s
mind re-enacts the famous scene from Billy Wilder’s The Seven Year
Itch in an underground garage, and dressed all in red. She
(Kelly LeBrock) even does it twice, so our boy can’t miss the point.
He’s an adman, she’s an agency model. He telephones
her across the office but gets the very aggressively plain Ms. Milner (Gilda
Radner) by mistake without knowing it. He sets up a date that rather than going
awry doesn’t come off at all.
That little contretemps has its revenges, and meanwhile Wilder
branches out in a wide view of Pierce’s coterie, three chums (Joseph
Bologna, Michael Huddleston, Charles Grodin), a
married philanderer, a married woman’s lover, and the other other man. Pierce is a married man all the way, so his steps toward
straying are crafty and clumsy. He changes his look
and is received in the boardroom with a staring POV like Buddy Love. Caught
shaving fully-dressed for a nighttime rendezvous, he replies backwards from
Humbert Humbert that his wife’s not crazy, so he is.
In the clinches there is the betrayal of the noisy water bed,
like Emerson in Welles’ The Stranger, “when you commit a
crime...” The scene has amusing lyrics,
Baby
let’s just take off our clothes |
The photo session (model as Bo-Peep) has another song with another
singer (Dionne Warwick) in three or four of her finest minutes. Wilder’s best shot has him perched on a high ledge
in a bathrobe as a news crew sets up a camera in a long shot that zooms right
in to a close-up seen on TV around the dining room table in his home. The conclusion puts down a vaudeville five for Blake
Edwards’ 10 and doubles it with the superb final jest.
Haunted Honeymoon
“Humor and horror make an uneasy combination,” according
to Walter Benjamin of the New York Times. A
film that sorely tries the intellectual capacities of the Times is, you
will surely agree, perhaps such a commonplace as to be truly frightening, yet
there’s something funny about it for all that, but why equivocate? Byron felt so strongly that the Quarterly Review
killed Keats, he wrote verses proclaiming the deed. And who, now, reads the Quarterly
Review?
The strange, bizarre murder at the outset is an error revealed
near the end. After the credits, during which John Morris rises to new heights,
Wilder effortlessly re-creates a New York radio broadcast, this week’s
episode of Manhattan Mystery Theatre also bears the title “Haunted
Honeymoon”. For once, the sound effects man is
not a figure of fun. He’s an artist like all the rest, the deep-voiced
announcer, the well-trained actors (Radner’s dramatic voice is a skilled
attunement, added to her Thirties character voice). The
script takes on a life of its own.
The main framework is established as radio at its highest. The cinematic equivalent is built of several well-known
models, and some unfamiliar. The bed panel from Frank Strayer’s The
Monster Walks, the arm-holding-candelabra from Cocteau’s La Belle
et la Bête, his passage through glass, Dreyer’s Vampyr (the
viewing window in the premature coffin). There are
jokes that are not jokes. Wilder mentions a widower.
“Widower than what?” asks Bryan Pringle as Pfister, the butler.
“A widow man?” The psychological component
is rather breathtaking in its virtuosity and fulfillment on any number of levels,
of course it’s all gag material finally, but played so expertly. The direction hews close enough to its models to diligently
give one a start on occasion, but is also modern and flexible enough to allow
Dom DeLuise as Aunt Kate to relieve his excruciatingly funny number with an
occasional hoot. All of the performances are very
carefully rendered, and then filmed to give a nuance of freedom. Peter
Vaughan’s Transatlantic accent is a welcome touch.
It consoles one in a way to see a work of genius savaged like
Elliot Silverstein’s Nightmare Honeymoon, considering the caliber
of the critics and the wispy tastes of the public. So many times over the past
twenty or thirty years, films advancing the art of cinema have met with sheer
incomprehension, it’s no wonder the Oscars are given out in a shopping
mall, with every respect due to Paul Mazursky.
The radio drama is a vital thing, and in a certain sense Wilder
may be said to have fashioned a dithyramb expounding its imaginative mysteries. The impressive set is a well-filmed castle, in which the
classic psychological situation of pre-nuptial jitters is explored from every
possible angle. This is the real source of the comedy and of the film (as it is
of Maté’s D.O.A., for example) and not, as the critics supposed, a
satirical impulse toward films that knew exactly what they were doing.
There is a werewolf, and a plot to scare the bridegroom out of
his stammering w’s, and a changed will, with plenty of bizarrerie
solidly formed and yet transparent as nicely-observed comedy. To describe it at
all is to diminish the evanescence and resonance of it. In the end, the happy
honeymooners depart the broadcast, and the werewolf turns to look at the
camera, then walks down the road after them as double doors slowly shut behind
him like a slitted version of an iris-out.
It’s a good thing to see these heebie-jeebies pooh-poohed
as trite, old hat, etc. That is partly Wilder’s position toward them as
well. He pursues his floating bride to an open grave with an arm and a veil
protruding from it, and later finds the arm a detachable prop, the ever-present
lightning a stage effect. But he sees more than the critics, and the public
overlooked in its haste a film it will come to admire.
The simple truth is that Wilder understands more about the
cinema, is far more learned in its precedents and modes, and has a much better
sense of humor than the critics. It shouldn’t have to be said, but in the
age of communication there is still much that is little understood.
Postmodernity is unmistakably a step to the rear, and that’s why even in
this latter day the columnist Anne Taylor Fleming lamented her son becoming an
artist, since after all Van Gogh failed to sell but one measly wee picture.