Buck and the Preacher
Poitier’s
comical version of The Ten Commandments,
with Harry Belafonte in the role of Aaron and Cameron Mitchell as Pharaoh,
filmed in the style of the latter Gunsmoke,
with an adept and controlled use of the Frankenheimer zoom.
Uptown Saturday Night
A little look at
America from the vantage point of its varied commercial enterprises, its
political leaders, and most notably its bosses, which decides
in the end that “Home—and Certainty and Sanctity, are best.”
Let’s Do It Again
A satire on the
gentle side, whose incidental targets are Gordon Parks viewed as a maker of
flashy gangster films, and Black Mohammedanism viewed as a friendly sort of
fraternal order like the Shriners (fez and all), from the standpoint of Laurel
& Hardy (the “Sons and Daughters of Shaka”).
The main gag has
Jimmie Walker as a chump hypnotized into a champ, and when the ruse is found
out, his opponent gets the whammy put on him, too—a pox on both their
houses, these mobsters (John Amos and Calvin Lockhart).
Much of the
comedy is in the costumes worn by these quiet Atlantans in the underworld of
New Orleans: Denise Nicholas in fire-engine-red boa and knee-high boots (gold),
platinum wig, split miniskirt and scarlet garter, Bill Cosby in his Matisse
beard and wraparound shades with pink or yellow frames (plastic).
A Piece of the Action
Poitier’s
jokes are of the very best, and tend to constitute the basis of his films, so
that Uptown Saturday Night is laid in Atlanta as a send-up of the
Baptists, and Let’s Do It Again in New Orleans (where the city
seal is a crescent moon and star) for the Muslims, whereas A Piece of the
Action goes to Chicago for a different kind of setup to the main gag in the
home of a mobster (Titos Vandis). He’s counting the money and checking
the books when he sees plainclothesmen pull up outside. The books go down to
the basement, but he can’t burn money, so he gives the briefcase to his
cleaning lady, who is black, and asks her to run an errand. The cops never
arrive, he’s been had, and Poitier has his joke on certain forms of charitable
activity.
Stir Crazy
The director who
filmed the Book of Exodus as Buck and the Preacher could hardly flinch
at a history of America by Bruce Jay Friedman. An actor and a playwright flee
the squalor of New York for California, and in Arizona they wear woodpecker
costumes for a bank promotion, which is sticking a feather in your hat and
calling it macaroni. The plot device calls for two other men to borrow the
costumes and rob the bank, which effects a change of perspective.
The actor is a
student of human nature, but the playwright is a born bullrider, so they enter
the intermural prison rodeo and contend with the champion, whose name is Caesar
Geronimo. And they make a clever, daring escape, with the actor doing a
quick-change from rodeo clown to goateed Westerner. As grand, inspired and
delirious as that is, Friedman has it couched in terms of a prison movie parody
full of satire whose barefaced surrealism is fleshed out by the inventions of
Wilder and Pryor, while Poitier plays it all as close to the chest as possible.
Hanky Panky
Hanky Panky proved to be too difficult for comprehension at
the time, apparently. Its style is very acutely derived from The 39 Steps,
its content is a direct allusion to Seven Days in May.
Halliwell ineptly
characterizes this as a spoof of North by Northwest, but there is a
grain of astute observation in that, because of a crosscut structure which adds
a further level of difficulty. Add to this an entirely independent stream of
surrealist imagery and you have an homage to Hitchcock
comparable to Donen’s Charade and Arabesque, superbly
organized and played exceedingly well, which seems to have produced nothing
more than a gasp of incomprehension despite the painstaking care of Poitier to
establish it all on firm, solid ground.
Within an idea of
style not based on the pictorial but the imagistic, Poitier takes no end of
pains with nearly each shot. A good example of this is at the end of the Grand
Canyon sequence, the desert crash-landing. Gene Wilder emerges from the
wreckage and clutches a tumbleweed to his lips with gratitude (the pilot
collapsed after takeoff, a forced landing followed, out of It’s a Mad
Mad Mad Mad World), he and Gilda Radner are met by a military detail in
combat gear. Poitier has a three-second shot of the wreck, that’s all,
but this location exterior is dressed with minute attention to detail, the
various parts of the plane, etc., only to serve as background to a simple gag
and pivot the film towards its culmination.
Many, many shots
are richly detailed in this way, or soak up large amounts of locality in quick
flight, as it were. And there you have the distinction from Donen, who abandons
himself to large-scale pictorial constructions. Poitier gets the sharp,
compressed wealth of detail in a single shot, Donen the grand sweep of action
creating a panorama. They are both effective.
The multiplicity
of the structure serves to clarify the texture, and only the description of it
is difficult. This is Hanky Panky’s specific contribution, a confirmed
articulation supplying the homage of a reflection.
A painter hangs
himself after painting the Grand Canyon’s South Rim with its watchtower.
A man is poisoned in a New York club, and a woman is murdered in a hotel nearby
after crossing paths with an architect (Wilder) and mailing a padded envelope.
The architect is suspected in her death, and flees with the help of another
innocent (Radner). They head north, retrieve the envelope, decipher its
contents as well as the painting (by an old friend of the architect’s new
accomplice), find themselves in the Arizona desert at a remote military
installation rather like Frankenheimer’s ECOMCON, and reveal a
governmental infight like a coup.
There you have
the general outlines. Hitchcock’s Rich and Strange is partly an homage to Keaton, and has a gag from Lloyd. Wilder does a
perfect Keaton, slipping under a truck to avoid capture, then, when the truck
drives away, sitting halfway up and looking askance.
Robert Prosky has
the Leo G. Carroll part, or is he the ringleader? Richard Widmark takes command
of the operatives in immediate pursuit. The depth of seriousness on this end is
what shows Wilder to be a comedian of limitless resources (at the controls of
the pilotless plane, he even resembles Soupy Sales). Radner has lacerating
style and invention to match.
Poitier’s
approach to this material is in every way satisfactory. There is nothing finer
than this level of sophistication, achieved by mere application of industry to
inspiration, with something more. The New England Aquarium might have been
borrowed as a location in homage to Arabesque, or it might just be the
remote echoes of Lowell that are obtained by filming there, who can say?
“Behind their cage, / yellow dinosaur steamshovels were grunting / as
they cropped up tons of mush and grass / to gouge their underworld
garage.”
Ghost Dad
It’s not at
all uncommon nowadays to find a film completely misunderstood by the critics
and the public, and when this happens it’s a matter of great astonishment
but also of great joy, because you have the pleasure of a discovery that seems
to be unique, even though the filmmakers must surely have known all along what
they were doing. Sometimes the astonishment is all the greater for the
self-evident clarity of the work, so that it becomes impossible to determine
why the reaction has occurred, and Ghost Dad is the most blatant example
of this.
The opening
sequence is one of the funniest reels of film ever put together, and
blisteringly so (it should be pointed out that Poitier’s technical acumen
as a director, which has always been keen, has attained a precision
that’s really flawless). An executive is preparing for work, he’s
arranging a company merger, as he makes his way to the office (and from there
to the bank), one disaster after another just misses him, in building
anticipation of the premise, until he’s whisked off by a bearded madman
driving a cab, who wants to know if he’s declared his loyalty to Satan.
The terrified executive replies, in the words of Handel, “I am
Satan,” which produces instant obedience from the cabdriver, but too
late, the cab winds up at the bottom of a river, and this is seen later to
invoke Herk Harvey’s Carnival of Souls.
Invisible but to
the camera the executive walks along busy Third Street, wondering if
that’s to be eternity for him. He’s whisked to London by Sir Edith
(pronounced Eddith) Moser, an expert on spiritual phenomena. He has to complete
the merger for his kids’ sake, because of the promotion it brings.
This educes a
secondary or ghost theme, the absentee dad. His son is an amateur magician, but
unsupervised locks himself into a Trunk of Doom during Show and Tell at school,
and invisible dad has to help him out.
A portrait of
John F. Kennedy in the background of this scene tells the tale, revealing the
subject of this film, though much of it and many of its jokes can be taken
several ways (it seems incredible the critics missed them all, dullness reaches
no blunter point), the main gag being it’s not so much that Kennedy is
dead, as that his spirit has departed from the body politic for the time.
There are really
two aspects of Ghost Dad, equally significant and interdependent, to be
considered. This large-scale reflection on Kennedy and his legacy is greatly
important and closely related to Reitman’s Dave and Kasdan’s
I Love You to Death, among others, and at the same time, it’s
handled in a style that’s suited to its subject, as well as being one of
the most unattainable reaches of style in all of cinema, one that has not been
properly understood or even studied before Poitier miraculously achieved it
after a quarter-century, and that is the body of work amassed by Walt Disney
after much labor, exemplified by incalculable masterpieces such as The
Absent Minded Professor and Mary Poppins—and if you
don’t know what is meant here, you are probably a film critic or Michael
Eisner.
It may be that
understanding these things in all their complications and subtleties is an
attainment in itself, but to have encompassed them in a film and found such a
means for its expression is what makes the capstone of a great career as a
director, and the film toward which in a certain sense Poitier’s great
and satisfying work has tended.
It’s still
hard to think of an actor as a director, even after Welles, Stroheim, Brando,
Eastwood and Allen, and President Kennedy has his detractors, and Disney has
preferred to remake its films rather than understand them, so these are three
good reasons for critical antipathy. If you add to this the multiplicity of
Poitier’s jokes, you get a bewilderment among
the critics precisely matching the rage they have exhibited. I don’t
mind, but Poitier’s absence from the director’s chair is sorely
missed. Harold Lloyd is certainly an influence on the opening reel, and he
couldn’t bear adverse criticism, either.
Poitier and Cosby
are each able to sustain a film alone, and when they appear together they share
the screen. Cosby directed by Poitier takes direction studiously (he is a great
actor, perhaps best seen in Peter Yates’ fabulously underrated Mother,
Jugs & Speed), so that two heads are better than one. Cosby sometimes
mimics Poitier quite visibly, and the result is somehow twice as funny.
Arthur
Lubin’s Impact and Rudolph Maté’s D.O.A. are related
to Ghost Dad because of the businesslike metaphors involved. The subtle
depictions of fellow executives give a nuance of the late Fifties, and Barry
Corbin’s portrayal of the boss is characteristically adroit, with a
memory of Alan Hewitt’s general pursuing flubber.
All of the acting
is perfect, the child actors have at least been noted, every detail is
correctly realized, and that is what is most remarkable of all, the consciously
perfect realization of a film in all of its many aspects. But you can read for
yourself in Ebert and Canby how such a thing is prized by those who are paid to
be in the know.
A small note
about Sir Edith Moser (Ian Bannen), the part may have been conceived under the
inspiration of Margaret Leighton in From Beyond the Grave. Finally,
among other influences there is a striking citation of It’s a
Wonderful Life effortlessly introduced.