The
Comedian
Playhouse 90
The Sammy
Hogarth Comicular, “straight
to the top”, a live ninety-minute television revue, “never been
done before”, represented as in rehearsals and then broadcast to forty
million people.
This is a live broadcast,
Serling takes advantage of the congruity. Surrealistic compression is his forte
on the production side, the writer under pressure is a dead rookie soldier from
the Bulge, critics circle like buzzards, the studio is a maelstrom, the star is
a maniac, Frankenheimer’s cameras are caught up in the frenzy of the
moment.
The star is a
genius, the writer is tired, the critics are “fleas”.
The off-camera
madness has a backstage pedigree and a foreglimpse of Resnais’ Providence.
Clash By Night
Playhouse 90
Frankenheimer’s
approach has been to understand the key of Odets’ style in this play as a
forced simple directness on the surface, to which a chorus of unseen
associations is superadded or within which it is revealed. Frankenheimer plays
to this key exclusively in broad straight lines and continuous, often very
close work with the actors.
The Gogolian
chorus appears, invisibly, Mae’s first husband (“a Pennsylvania
politician”), Earl’s ex-wife (“a burlesque dancer”),
Jerry’s late mother (“an old Polish song about a little house you
want to get back to”). These unseen characters mirror the action, a love
triangle.
Jerry is a
carpenter, Earl a projectionist. Earl dies in the booth, Mae is locked out on
the spiral stairs below, the cinematic blossoming does not take place
(“this imminence of a revelation which does not occur is, perhaps, the
aesthetic phenomenon,” says Borges, speculating on the Great Wall of
China).
The performances
by E.G. Marshall, Kim Stanley and Lloyd Bridges are beyond heroism and subtlety,
they match Frankenheimer’s direction note for note.
The Young Savages
A paranoiac, a
moron and a joiner, all under the ægis of a street gang in Italian Harlem
called The Thunderbirds, stride into Puerto Rican Harlem and knife a blind
harmonica-player to death. The victim is later determined to have been a
“warlord” in The Horsemen, another gang. Each gang accuses the
other of using heroin, among other interesting details.
The D.A. is
running for governor, a prima facie case brings forth an indictment of
first-degree murder. Clean justice, newspaper justice, is hard to obtain. The
prosecutor does his best in court to settle the matter.
The function of
the courtroom is seen as the revelation of truthful evidence, which is then
placed before the jury, whose decision is acted upon by the judge.
“Doesn’t
provide much valid drama or do much good,” said Bosley Crowther in the New
York Times. Variety agreed, saluting Frankenheimer’s direction
nevertheless in a sort of way.
Crowther
specifically objected to the prosecutor, an assistant district attorney named
Bell whose father changed his name from Bellini, the son married outside the
neighborhood and moved away, he might have married a girl who is the mother of
the joiner, she wouldn’t have him, and so on in a characterization that
is of the greatest significance except to Crowther.
“Zorro”
of The Horsemen likes Picasso, the dead boy’s sister is a witness and a
hooker since she was fourteen, they’re all kids, it’s an
unattractive and very sordid mess, the same New York it was thirty years
earlier, looked at a little more intently perhaps yet exactly the same way, but
Crowther only knew what he read in the papers, he tells us.
All Fall Down
The great whirl
of Kelly’s Invitation to the Dance ends with Frankenheimer’s
title, on much the same grounds.
Inge (from the
author of Midnight Cowboy) sets into a complicated labyrinthine pattern
his characters, a ladykiller and a mankiller, and lets them destroy each other
very amusingly, in a surrealistic way, especially considering the family lights
and tokens surrounding them.
Variety was content simply to miss the boat, Crowther gave
himself a brass band for the occasion.
Birdman of Alcatraz
The curious point
of unaccountability in the death of an inmate during the Alcatraz prison riot
is the point of contact with Nicholas Ray’s Wind Across the Everglades.
Dassin’s Brute Force prepares the analysis, which
is practically a diagnosis from Walsh’s White Heat.
The
record of a “surprising conversion”, the question of rehabilitation.
Variety
and A.H. Weiler (New
York Times) thought of it as breaking the mold, Tom Milne (Time Out Film Guide) “a likeable
film.”
“Overlong”,
says Halliwell’s Film Guide,
“and rather weary”.
The Manchurian Candidate
It’s
Laurence Harvey because it’s Hamlet, the particular flashback
style utilized is by Welles in Citizen Kane, a major analysis is given
to Sternberg’s Jet Pilot.
Stoppard’s Rosencrantz
and Guildenstern Are Dead offers a slightly different angle on the play.
Josie/Rosie gives the simple parallel Shaw/Marco. The poetic lists are provided
by Marco’s reading matter and the suspect lineup at the Department of
Defense.
The ladies of the
garden club give yak dung to our GIs in Manchuria, “tastes good like a
cigarette should”, and suffer one or two to be killed for experimental
purposes.
The candidate is
a paid Soviet agent and no. 2 on the party ticket for November. The ghost he
emulates is Abraham Lincoln. There is a touch of Hitchcock’s The Man
Who Knew Too Much (first version) in the final planning. Altman’s Nashville
echoes the outcome.
There is a
strange mirror of the outward structure in Russell’s Women in Love
with its parallelisms. The final despairing shot is taken up in Smight’s Harper.
Brainwashed,
Manchuria is understood to be New Jersey.
A fulsome
critique of McCarthyism.
Seven Days in May
“I’m gonna tell you the damnedest story you ever heard.”
“Site X,
Mount Thunder CP. Site Y, Ecomcon.”
Gen. Walker is
mentioned, also Sen. McCarthy.
Given the choice,
Jefferson said he would rather have a newspaper in front of him than a
government on top of him. Ecomcon stands for emergency communications control,
the linchpin of a military takeover. The material is extensively reworked from
“The Parallel” (dir. Alan Crosland, Jr. for The Twilight Zone).
The objection is
to peace with the enemy in a time of nuclear weapons. Ecomcon is to seize
television and radio and telephone communications.
The
chairman’s former mistress offers “the truth, which is very
rare.”
Neame’s
commentary is telling in sufficient ways (The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie),
if critics haven’t noticed. Frankenheimer has another use for the
material as biography (George Wallace). The Articles of Constitution are
identified in the opening titles with the pending days of the action, patriotism
is certainly the ultimate resource of a scoundrel, anyway.
The actors are
all the finest, Frankenheimer puts them all in the wind with an absolutely
precise technique that salvages from the wreckage of democracy a plain
statement of refusal that ends the conspiracy once and for all, concurrent with
Lumet’s Fail-Safe and Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove.
The Train
Deflection of a
Resistance group in Paris to a non-military objective.
The connoisseur
and the Maquis, the latter is plied with “the national heritage”
and “the glory of France”, which he repeats as “the pride of
France”.
The systematic
arguments as a way of understanding the predicament also figure in
Neame’s The Horse’s Mouth.
Real trains (one
goes off the track and jars the camera). Real art, anyway the crates being
carted off to Germany like Langlois’ cans of film are stenciled with the
great names of French painting. And when Labiche is faced with his last
dilemma, hostages on the locomotive, one is liable to be reminded of Godard’s
idea for a Holocaust film, a study of train schedules and secretaries typing
them up in offices.
The German
officer gives out three reasons for his plunder. To the curator at the Jeu de
Paume, he proposes that the work will be transported to a safe place. His commanding
officer learns that the cargo is more valuable than gold. Labiche is told that
“beauty belongs to the man who can appreciate it.”
The Train begins at the same time as Clément’s Paris
brûle-t-il?, and Frankenheimer compresses all the harrowing effect of
Carné’s elucidations (Les Enfants du paradis) into a single title,
“1511th day of German occupation”.
The balletic
method of filming locomotives and train switches is like juggling with ten-ton
barbells, camera movement is delicately polished, sound editing is an essential
component.
The film has
special significance overlooked by Canby, who could not figure out its center
of gravity. Art? Resistance?
The maddest of
all hallucinations is engendered by Frankenheimer in black-and-white shots of
trains and clocks like a famous picture-book on Relativity.
The opening scene
at the Jeu de Paume, closed to the public and guarded by a machine-gun
emplacement, is reflected in a central sequence of Litvak’s The Night
of the Generals.
It will be seen
that the problem for Frankenheimer is to rise to his occasion, otherwise there
is only Didont’s query to the curator, “don’t you have copies
of ‘em?”
The question is neither
Art nor Resistance, though both are answered, but Von Waldheim. “I need
an audience,” says Russell’s Gaudier Brzeska just before the story
of the little bird, the farmer, and the fox.
All the art in
question is identified as degenerate by Colonel von Waldheim himself, a
loyal Nazi and an admirer. The old engineer is put to the wall for sabotage,
whereupon Frankenheimer launches into a machine-shop demonstration of casting
and fitting a part at once applied to the damaged locomotive (a sequence seemingly
related to Herzog’s Fitzcarraldo, a key point related to the main
inspiration of Lean’s The Bridge on
the River Kwai).
The Longest
Day is an observable influence,
but a gag from Mackendrick’s The Ladykillers (Labiche returns to
the Hôtel de la Gare, opens a door and sees Germans racing toward it) varied
with consequences for Peckinpah’s The Wild Bunch (Captain Schmidt
opens the caboose door and sees Pesquet’s engine bearing down on him)
suggests another source of inspiration (Annakin’s Those Magnificent
Men in Their Flying Machines has yet another variant, coincidentally),
Spinet’s resemblance to Mrs. Lopsided is of the utmost importance.
Stationmasters’
offices anticipate Menzel’s Closely Watched Trains. A carefully
monumental theme of Art has one of its divagations portray the ruse from Metz
to Rive-Reine.
The calmly
perfect acting is led by Burt Lancaster laconic as Bullitt, athletic as Keaton
or Fairbanks or Lloyd, under the Occupation a top railroad man and Resistance
fighter who is averse to the Jeu de Paume’s mission. His movements are
mainly downward, until he lies amongst foliage beside the reflective stream
along the tracks in the final scene.
The
stationmaster’s nephew at Rive-Reine climbs to the roof before dawn to
set off the air-raid signal as a diversion to the Passover painting of the
railroad cars (following on the “gesture” of a French division sent
to liberate Paris, a delay), is shot and falls, this movement is repeated by
Labiche as he limps up the steep hill and slides down the other side to the
tracks.
The final image
of dead hostages and crated paintings beside the train halted between the river
and the road along which Labiche returns to Rive-Reine is punctuated only by
the sound of the boiler expiring and Jarre’s Gallic tune (the editing is
a Hitchcockian assemblage of motionless shots, with one tracking on
Labiche’s wounded right leg as he pauses briefly beside a crate of
Braques). It sums up the sort of experience Frankenheimer had of creating works
as vital and excruciated as this one.
William Carlos
Williams’ celebrated and misunderstood lines,
It is difficult to get the news from
poems yet men die miserably every day for lack of
what is found there. |
simply mean,
“where there is no vision, the people perish,” not to put too fine
a point on it.
DeMille’s The Ten Commandments for the
characterization of Labiche and the structure. De Sica’s The Bicycle Thief is an important
citation. The route to Germany leads through Verdun and Metz.
“I have
left nothing undone” (Poussin), death of Didont.
Seconds
The story of a
banker who becomes an artist (cp. Story
of a Love Story). The plastic surgery is from Cocteau’s Orphée
(“what shall the marble say when it is struck?”), the sad fate from
Sternberg’s The Blue Angel.
Critical
misapprehension ended where it began, with the Dionysiac ritual that is
precisely what it claims to be, not a satire.
The film went
into the tank, Frankenheimer never recovered, and it is always the same with
Frankenheimer.
The invincibly
weird camerawork has at least escaped notice as a vital stylization tending
toward a new expression and a new style in a very difficult film, otherwise the
insult would be too absurd. “For many are called, but few are
chosen.”
Grand Prix
The strange,
unreal sport, part business, part chic, part divertissement, part
tradition, part something else again.
The three major
aspects of the film have been praised, condemned, and ignored, they are
Frankenheimer’s camera style, the drama, and the visual plan.
The first has been
amply described, helicopter shots, camera-mounted cars, it is able to show a
driver and then pan right 90° to view the banked curve ahead over the right
front wheel, maintaining the level horizon. Monte Carlo, especially, receives a
beautiful analysis of aerial and ground shots.
The remarkable
drama is a compilation of four stories (like the Somerset Maugham Quartet) conducted simultaneously and
concurrently. Robert Alan Aurthur’s screenplay, a decade after Edge of the City, is of the same
detailed character and stamp, its richness and complexity as independent
strands individually correlated, and the minute construction of each story on
solid lines with increments of consideration in each element, make for the
formal necessity of Frankenheimer’s split-screen conjunctions at various
points.
The very wide
screen, finally, is given a sense of horizontal trajectory as the basis of many
a shot, typically in exteriors, whether the camera is moving or not. Interiors,
by contrast, acquire the view of complicated obstacles, corners, etc. The main
exception is a medium two-shot (Saint and Montand) against a black sky.
The Fixer
Just before the
end of Tsarist Russia, a handyman from the shtetl
travels to Kiev and runs smack into a pogrom.
He then meets Potiphar’s daughter and deals with corrupt accounting
practices at his employer’s brickworks. Arrested for sexual assault, he
is about to be released (charged only with the misdemeanor of living among the goyim) after the girl is questioned by
the examining magistrate, but the prosecuting attorney steps in with a new
charge, ritual murder.
A boy messing
about the brickworks has tuned up dead, investigation reveals his mother and
the brutish lover she blinded with carbolic acid were dealing in stolen goods,
the talkative boy was drowned in a tub, stabbed afterwards, and left in a cave.
The handyman is
charged with using the boy’s blood to make Passover matzoh, not charged but imprisoned in hopes of a confession, which
is sought with beatings and torture. The effete but honest examining magistrate
is hanged in the cellblock, the effeminate and cynical Minister of Justice sees
a political advantage in the persecution, it unifies the people against someone
who is not the Tsar.
Frankenheimer’s
preparations are thoroughgoing and meticulous, the entire film could be watched
for the décor alone, and within it he has set portraits and dramatic scenes
that exhaustively tell the tale, of which critics understood not one word.
Ebert explained
the problem in a lecture to Frankenheimer. “Archibald MacLeish said a
poem should not mean, but be. It is a lesson John Frankenheimer should
learn.”
The examining
magistrate reaches a very useful conclusion early on. “It isn’t
madness that turns the world upside down. It’s conscience.”
The Gypsy Moths
This is probably
Frankenheimer’s greatest film, though critics were bored (Variety,
New York Times, Chicago Sun-Times, Halliwell’s Film
Guide, Time Out Film Guide) and saw next to nothing in it.
The “cape
stunt” is Simon Magus in Victor Saville’s great work, The Silver
Chalice.
Bridgeville,
Kansas. “We have a college, we have a college and a missile base, typical
little American town.”
The aerial tummelers
leave it to descend toward it at terrific speeds for two bucks fifty per head
from the townspeople.
Sun or rain on a
screen door or porch screen has exactly the expressiveness it ought to have,
like everything else in this picture.
The influence on
the opening sequence of Lewis Gilbert’s Moonraker is evident.
The Extraordinary Seaman
A work of genius
so extraordinary even French critics could not take its measure.
Such things as
Keaton’s The Navigator,
Mankiewicz’ The Ghost and Mrs. Muir, Huston’s The African Queen, the adroit use of
wartime newsreels in most apposite counterpoint, and indeed the whole point of
the film, seem to have been lost on private and professional filmgoers.
That is too bad,
because subsequently Columbia was bought by Sony, which issued a research paper
declaring film to be inherently “a perishable medium”, and now
“film is dead”, says Lumet.
I Walk the Line
A study of mortal
ennui and the cure, which is dumping the deputy in the lake behind the Federal
dam that drowned the childhood home.
Frankenheimer
doesn’t finish this, he leaves the integers to add up in the spectator’s
mind.
The Horsemen
Under the sign of
Kafka, an allegory (reduced in production from a three-and-a-quarter-hour
roadshow arrangement).
The one-legged
horseman is the same image as in Renoir’s The River, arrived at by attrition as in Cocteau’s Orphée.
Twenty-five days
were spent shooting the main Afghan sporting event, ended by an all but
invisible personage unhorsing the hetman’s son.
He takes the road
less traveled, receives the horse, and makes his own way.
Among filmmakers,
few can understand how this was achieved, Huston probably.
The reviews are
cretinous. Palance is a known quantity, Sharif is one of the great actors,
Taylor-Young is sublime, all the cast are perfect.
Frankenheimer’s
direction has the same flawless, heroic acuity.
The same
formulation as in Reindeer Games.
Story of a Love Story
Impossible Object by Nicholas Mosley, the author of Accident
(dir. Joseph
Losey).
Mallarmé to begin, “l’espace a pour jouet le cri:
‘Je ne sais pas!’” Musée
Bourdelle, the speaking works... “Would you
like a drink? Would you like lunch? Would you—?”
Cf.
Pinter’s Betrayal (dir. David
Hugh Jones) and Frank D. Gilroy’s Once
in Paris... variously. L’Impossible
objet, Histoire d’une histoire
d’amour, cf. Buñuel’s
Cet Obscur Objet Du Désir.
“The game
in the cellar,” cf. Plath’s The
Bell Jar (dir. Larry Peerce), which is as much as
to say the answer is Paris, at home it’s Joseph in the well. “The
Extra Person”. The question is whether or not a modus vivendi can be reached, you
can’t work in Toronto and live in New York, says Glenn Gould, it
has to be the other way round. “I never know what’s true and what isn’t with you.” English
writer, American wife, French mistress (married). The climax takes place in
Morocco to be sure but not the ending, “did you think that was the
end?” Whither all roads lead. “Où?”
“N’importe.”
“You expect
me to be like God.” The imaginative realm, “crappy
astronauts!” Hippolyta. “Where did you
get all this?”
“From the junkheap of my mind,” she says with Yeats.
Cocteau’s Orphée, carved by
circumstances. “What is the good of being a witch and a magician if we
cannot work miracles?”
“They gave
good value in the old days.” The original title, “the point is that
life is impossible. A mirror is held
to the back of your head, and you see your hand move in the opposite way from
what you intended.” The plumber in the attic on “suffering
children”, the writer’s wastepaper basket that won’t hold
water. Magritte’s La Condition humaine. “What’s it about?”
“God. God
in a bed-sitter.” A thief in the night. “You always think you can
work miracles.”
“Don’t
you want me to exorcise it?”
“You do
what you want.”
“I have a
great longing for order and stillness, I do not like chaos.”
Shelley’s misadventure, the Mallarméan
shipwreck, certainly the “don du poème” that for Hume
“fell stillborn from the press” (cf. Smight’s Rabbit,
Run).
The Frankenheimer
styling (his most beautiful) is kept to a minimum or applied to the regulation
of three or four styles simultaneously, Chabrol, Robbe-Grillet, Fellini, Losey
if you like (The Romantic Englishwoman
for “tu veux tout”,
from Baudelaire as throughout), perhaps Hans Richter (8 x 8), to convey the several dimensions of the story that make the
“threefold security” of George Roy Hill’s Slaughterhouse-Five seem child’s
play, if you will (there is also Resnais’ Providence, Je t’aime Je t’aime as well).
Set designs Alexandre Trauner, cinematography
Claude Renoir, score Michel Legrand. A film that was
to have been directed by Losey, but due to a falling-out over The Assassination of Trotsky went to
Frankenheimer (who, in the words of a scholar, “dramatically changed
it”) and was unreleased by dint of financial difficulties, it’s
said (“Impossible Object, which
Frankenheimer had to finance with his credit card after the European producer
went broke,” according to the Los
Angeles Times), or very sparingly (it was shown out of competition at
Cannes alongside Losey’s A Doll’s
House, Truffaut’s La Nuit américaine,
Furie’s Lady Sings the Blues, Jodorowsky’s The
Holy Mountain, Bergman’s Cries
and Whispers, Nicholas Ray’s We
Can’t Go Home Again, and the Forman et al. Visions of Eight),
“A John Frankenheimer Film”, he has the theme from Seconds, a film thought to pertain to
midlife crises and the counterculture (as happened to Lewin’s The Moon and Sixpence).
Variety,
“John Frankenheimer spent over a year in Paris and
then made this film for a local company... pic has an airy grace, fine
playing down the line.” Jonathan
Rosenbaum reported from Cannes for Time
Out, “to judge from all the reports, thousands of unlucky spectators
chose to suffer through Frankenheimer’s Impossible Object,”
also for Film Comment, “Frankenheimer’s
dreadfully Impossible Object.” TV Guide, “gracefully done,
engaging”. Hal Erickson (All Movie
Guide), “let us just offer our congratulations to Frankenheimer for
so stylishly breaking away from his standard ‘message’ mode”.
The Iceman Cometh
To end the pipe
dreams of a good wife and an anarchist mother.
To wit, that man
is good, that he can be dominated.
That is the main
structure, defined by Larry’s curtain speech on seeing both sides, with
pity for all.
And at that, very
funny. The additional gag of murder gives you the trial by daylight, such
things have to be put up with.
The play (cf. Hecht & MacArthur’s
Soak the Rich) for American Film
Theatre with cameras on the realistic set, act definitions, and an
intermission.
99 and 44/100% Dead
Richard Harris as
Harry resembles Michael Caine as Carter, not Palmer, and this is one sign of a
complex descriptive style sometimes mistaken for satire.
Harry is a gunman
in the mob wars, hired by Uncle Frank (Edmond O’Brien).
The adverse party
is Big Eddie (Bradford Dillman, an unforgettably etched performance).
The whole city
trembles before these two, as between the river graveyards on either side,
distinguished one from the other as in Borges’ poem, “Buenos Aires
Deaths”.
Harry’s
opposite number (Chuck Connors) has a mechanical hand with various implements,
none too bright.
The incidents of
the war are serious and comical, depicted with a measure of realism and a truly
surreal language to grasp the many layers of intended meaning.
These struck many
a reviewer at the time as gratuitous or worse, but a truer picture obtains
today, though critics still speak of a “futuristic” element
probably imagined from Frankenheimer’s generalized city locations
representing the one.
French Connection II
Doyle in
Marseille to catch Charnier, who shoots him full of dope and dumps him at
headquarters.
Doyle recovers
and shoots Frog One full of bullets.
The grueling désintoxication indicates
Dmytryk’s Murder, My Sweet, but
the theme of heroin as enemy action is the basis of Zinnemann’s A Hatful of Rain.
The structure of
the heroin trade has gone beyond corrupting five-eighths of the NYPD (the same
number of cops in Marseille search for Doyle when he’s kidnapped),
Charnier’s courier to higher-ups in Geneva is a U.S. Army general.
Black Sunday
A Palestinian
terrorist and her lover, an American ex-POW, are the leading operatives in a
Black September plot to riddle the Super Bowl in Miami with nails fired from
the Goodyear blimp, killing eighty thousand sports fans and the President in
attendance.
Timely
intervention from above spoils the plan, and so you have Mallarmé’s
“Un Spectacle interrompu”. This interrupted spectacle is
figured in the central image of a movie screen (the front wall of a desert
hangar in California) perforated in a test-firing of the weapon, powered by
plastique.
The cinematic
action of the Beirut raid echoes The War Wagon in homage, The Train
is cited subtly in Long Beach, the great central spectacle of Fasil’s
arrest in Miami is Frankenheimer at his most furiously realistic, the combined
footage at a real football game is completely virtuosic (with the director in
the CBS trailer, at work), all stops are pulled out for the surrealistic finale
(citing Panic in the City).
Among the actors,
one would like to point out Than Wyenn as the Israeli ambassador, a walk-on
that does him justice by succeeding in an impression favorable to his wishes,
the great actor appears to be a civilian acting in the role of himself.
Prophecy
A joke fulsomely
told in the Maine woods.
A chemical
treatment for logs kept idle in the water breeds monsters.
The Challenge
Ancient and modern
Japan are root and branch, two swords known as The Equals. To have them at odds
is a fatal situation, mobsters run great business empires, the heritage is lost
to view.
The theme is one
of Kurosawa’s most important (Sanshiro Sugata, etc.), and dates
from the war.
So there is an
American angle, dating from the war (Dmytryk’s Behind the Rising Sun,
Lloyd’s Blood on the Sun, Fuller’s House of Bamboo),
the culture must be comprehended to be dealt with.
Maslin of the New
York Times found this distasteful and not at all to her liking, Variety
saw little else, Halliwell’s Film Guide “plenty of
pretensions but no apparent message to spike its dismal entertainment
values” (and the Guardian “ridiculous, demeaning
stuff”).
The Holcroft Covenant
There is no way
of explaining the box office failure of this magnificent film, without coming
to the conclusion that Frankenheimer’s art escaped comprehension, even
though it’s roundly based on Hitchcock, primarily North by Northwest.
Bernard Hepton and Victoria Tennant are made to resemble Leo G. Carroll and Eva
Marie Saint marvelously well, and the main joke is curly-haired
“foreign-born American citizen” Michael Caine in the Cary Grant
role.
An inheritance
amounting to billions falls upon the sons of Nazi generals. Caine as Holcroft
is informed he’s really a Clausen, his life is in jeopardy, there is a
question of the legacy’s ultimate purpose.
This is where
Anthony Andrews displays his art right in front of the camera, slipping into an
uncanny impression of Hitler by sheer craft and inspiration, then back out of
it again, a most impressive feat, as another of the heirs.
Frankenheimer
introduces Andrews’ sister, who as in Hitchcock is a double agent, with
Carol Reed’s camera angles in The Third Man applied to the
interior of St. Martin-in-the-Fields. This is repeated throughout, in a Berlin
chase and shootout at night, for instance. The third heir is a symphony
conductor there. Frankenheimer has a night confab of Andrews, Caine and Tennant
with the Brandenburg Gate lighted in the background, asymmetrically arranged so
the right side has a far streetlamp against the black sky, crickets are heard,
night in Berlin.
The virtuosity of
a sequence like the attempted murder of Holcroft’s mother leaving her New
York bookstore, which involves a sentinel, a speeding car mowing down
pedestrians and crashing into the shop, followed by the sentinel with a bomb in
her handbag, is just that.
The plot is to
revive the Reich on a global scale exactly as it was done in Germany, by
organizing terrorist opposition into a single force for an attack which should
propel a strong leader into power with drastic measures. A thousand names on a
list are enough to change the world.
Berlin at
carnival time is made to evoke Weimar and aspects of the modern day.
Tennant’s cover is as a prostitute there in a Georg Grosz whorehouse.
Geneva, where the covenant is announced, is the occasion of views on the lake
and an homage to Blake Edwards.
So many people
have not seen The Holcroft Covenant (and some of those have written
reviews) that it amounts to almost “a violin in a void,” which is
anyway better than working a fiddle on the public.
52 Pick-Up
The secret of the
film is a patented process for fusing titanium and steel by means of an explosive,
described and demonstrated for NASA.
Opposed to this
is the badger game, a temporary arrangement with lingering consequences.
The blackmailers
destroy themselves by horning in.
Reviewers
generally found this negligible or perhaps “a return to form”,
Ebert described it as “well-crafted”.
Several of
Frankenheimer’s films can be discerned in it, Black Sunday for the
perforations after the mistress’s murder, Grand Prix for the drive
to sunup in the hills, French Connection II for the wife shot-up with
dope, and so on.
There is a
considerable rhyme with Blake Edwards’ 10 in the sex party.
Frankenheimer once dismissed this (“A John Frankenheimer Film”) as
“made for money”, but obviously he was kidding. It’s a series
of very wicked inventions on a theme of grotesque perversity, played for all
it’s worth and then some. Not only are scenes set up as comprehensive
gags and run to unforgettable limits, the élan or abandon of the whole thing
makes for a deep, rich sense of humor like a dash of bitters. Thus, Clarence
Williams III’s execution of the Sex Shop owner is a spectacular gag (the
screen shatters into shards of painted glass), followed by him walking away
like a skulking brute in an early Mad
Magazine. The hysterical elasticity of John Glover’s performance is a
barometer of the film’s dynamism, against which Roy Scheider and
Ann-Margret are pitted and deployed, as Beckett says, “facing the chaff
until it makes you laugh.” The final gag is a borrowing from Michael
Winner’s The Mechanic,
why not?
Dead Bang
Even considering
the critics’ usual inability to follow the affair, Dead Bang left
them amazingly stupefied.
Two anecdotes
will shed some light. Steve Martin had a spiritual awakening in a massage
parlor when a masseuse requested him to pay her an opulent sum of money to
watch him undress and masturbate.
Another fellow
had a pal with a large white dot painted on his dashboard. “What’s
it for,” asked the fellow. His pal explained that girls ask the same
question, the conversation turns to whiteness in the abstract, purity,
virginity, and so he scores. The fellow paints a white dot on his
dashboard, picks up a girl, and when she remarks, “what an interesting
dot,” he replies, “yeah, wanna fuck?”
The Fourth War
From Einstein, a
theory of armed conflict.
Twenty years
after the Prague Spring, things are better, “it is bullshit,” says a phonybaloney Czech, “big
bullshit.” The U.S. Army’s on a “PR” stint across the
border in Germany.
The theme is
transposed from The Train, two
colonels, bird and comrade (Frankenheimer’s subtitles omit translating tovarich).
Defectors are pawns, the commuter is an outlaw.
The casting is a
major consideration. Scheider looks ill-suited to his command, in the wild he
is Geronimo. Prochnow’s face (he speaks Russian) expresses the constraint,
ill-disciplined soldiers create the first incident, he finds release in
savagery. These are finer points than can be found elsewhere.
You won’t
mind if the critics failed to appreciate this, you’re a subscriber. Janet
Maslin’s “interesting little asides” (New York Times) are all the film, for example, and this is not a
“parable of the Cold War” but the reality of it (Variety saw “a well-made Cold War
thriller”).
Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times let it go by without a
wisp of comprehension (“Hollywood is running out of villains”),
like Entertainment Weekly
(“isn’t about a war at all—it’s about the nostalgia for
war”). Hal Hinson of the Washington
Post sided with Maslin (“Cold War parable”) only more so.
Jonathan Rosenbaum (Chicago Reader),
“John Frankenheimer still hasn’t regained his stride”, Time Out Film Guide, “quite a
mess,” etc.
Doubtless the
starting point is Schaffner’s Patton
and the Soviets (or John Hough’s version, Brass Target).
“Just so
long as I don’t die in a shirt with one o’ them little alligators
on the front,” the bird colonel is quoted as saying. The comrade colonel
is a son of a bitch.
The stylistic
flavor of a Peckinpah informs the slow-motion intercutting of action here and
there. The fistfight between the two men is filmed so as to suggest, among
other things, The Big Country (dir.
William Wyler, one might mention Pollack’s The Scalphunters and John Sturges’ Ice Station Zebra). The Napoleonic snowball is a Cocteau metaphor.
Year of the Gun
A complete
picture of the little weasel who lives in Rome on a New York publishing
contract. His book is false, regurgitated, pernicious, and only exists as a
ploy.
It becomes a best
seller when published with photographs by a stalwart recordist of war’s
ravages from behind a viewfinder.
In the background
of all this is the Red Brigades, a gang of thugs and hardened cadres spreading
mayhem. The book is about them, the weasel doesn’t know anything, he
cribs and cadges from published sources and makes things up.
The position
becomes uniquely clarified in Against the
Wall, the weasel with his vaguely left-wing narrative and the photographer
on the front lines pass into Attica radicals and guards for a mammoth showdown.
The quality of
satire at a deadpan level is realized in scenes of a university saturated with
radical slogans and banners, the American
News staffed by students without credentials, and the whole panoply of
radical chic (unmasked, the Brigade Rosse
looks like the Lenin-Stalin gang in Schaffner’s Nicholas and Alexandra).
Maniac at large
Tales from the Crypt
The WPA mural is
a sign of happier times at the city library, what with children carrying
switchblades and a killer loose in the neighborhood.
The library clerk
(Blythe Danner) is so upset and put upon that she stabs the librarian (Salome
Jens) with a confiscated switchblade, her first female victim.
Adam Ant is a
Hitchcockian murder buff and regular patron, Clarence Williams III a
necessitous security guard.
Against the Wall
Frankenheimer has
Birdman of Alcatraz immediately to hand,
of course, but also The Fixer, and
even Lumet’s The Hill and Dog Day Afternoon.
He cuts
effectively right down the middle of a “civil war” and finds a pox
on both your houses. In terms of The
Fixer, two varieties of madness both lacking in conscience.
The film explains itself as it goes along, which
accounts for the extremely odd notion that Frankenheimer had made a comeback.
Shaw pointed out that the British public would only respond to works of genius
if told before, during, and afterward.
Andersonville
A mere exercise
in futility, nothing counts for anything there, not even the monumental
uprising against the “raiders”.
That sequence is
sharply built out of King Rat, other information comes from Stalag 17
and The Great Escape, none of it matters. The prisoners serve out the
war in Andersonville and then some other stockades, many of them die.
The direction is
merely cursory as a rule, the acting catch-as-catch-can, the hellhole of
Andersonville represented convincingly.
The Island of Dr. Moreau
“A shape
with lion body and the head of a man.” The Felliniesque apparition of
Marlon Brando as Alfred Hitchcock (with a touch of Klaus Kinski) breaks open The Island of Dr. Moreau into an
analysis of modern-day genetic manipulation.
It’s filmed on the fly (Frankenheimer having been called in as a
replacement after pre-production and some days of shooting) with a technique
that might recall the lenses used in Seconds,
and it’s loosely built on Apocalypse
Now, 2001: A Space Odyssey,
and Battle for the Planet of the Apes,
with Val Kilmer and David Thewlis as a sort of New Age Heckle and Jeckle, and a
premonition of Austin Powers. One of the very few films in which Yeats and
Schoenberg figure, apart from Dante’s
Inferno, or is it Swinburne?
George Wallace
“Kiss my
Alabama ass goodbye,” he tells Harvard.
The good populist
Democrat who couldn’t be governor till he gave in to the Klan, and
couldn’t be president nohow, went to Dr. King’s church after all
and became a well-known black stand-up comic.
There’s a
lesson in it for politicians everywhere.
Ronin
The masterless
samurai is Vincent van Gogh by a trick, the absconded plot complained of by the
critics is of the “purloined letter” variety, in plain sight but
still not visible to most, if any, despite the crucial scene at Arles and the
actual sight of the Café Van Gogh (the Night Café at Arles), not to
mention Michael Lonsdale as Dr. Gachet by another trick.
Van Gogh picked
up Dutch painting where Rembrandt, Hals, Ruysdael and Vermeer left it, then
went to Paris where he mastered Impressionism, studied the Japanese, and went
South to pursue his researches. There, it might be argued very summarily as
here, a nervous collapse brought on by overwork and the specter of the past,
heightened by a conflict with Gauguin, ended his career at the advent of
Mondrian (who, like Matisse and Picasso, may be said to have reaped the benefit
of Van Gogh’s labors). That is the significance of the triangulated
meeting at Arles culminating in Vincent (Jean Reno) held at gunpoint and asked
where he’s known from. “Vienna” is the answer, the gun is
deflected and Sam (Robert De Niro) is wounded.
Under the
supervision of Lonsdale, playing a man whose hobby is toy ronin, Sam
tends his wound and recovers.
It will be seen,
one might think, that the principal key to Ronin is Minnelli’s Lust
for Life, especially in the ice ballet, a transformation of Van
Gogh’s face reflected in a mirror amidst nineteenth-century furnishings
in Theo’s apartment.
The stark raving
madness of Frankenheimer’s technique, primarily Steadicam with a 45-day
shooting schedule for the grand automobile chase alone, is designed to affront
the absurd view expressed in the LIFE Science Library volume, The
Mind, more than thirty years previously, that Van Gogh’s work exhibits
the symptoms of gradual schizophrenia.
Minnelli sees Van
Gogh out of his time, Altman considers Gachet, Frankenheimer weighs in on the
cost of going to Arles, each complements the others. The muse who dangles the
paintbox has her lord and master.
Reindeer Games
One of the
starting points is an impatience with admirers of the film noir who do
not see the point, this is right up Frankenheimer’s alley, he is admired
as a stylist but his films aren’t understood, “imaginary gardens
with real toads” figure early in this one. The point is made by means of
a joke so manifest that, underlined as it is or highlighted throughout, it
cannot be missed. Yet all the critics did.
Nick has Rudy
light the way for “Santa’s dwarves” to assist at the
dispensing of Christmas presents. That is the overall form. The structure is a
set of Chinese boxes, one within another. The main or Nick structure contains
the minor story of Rudy’s conversion from car thief to keeper of
Christmas, and within this Rudy structure is the film noir of the
“dwarves” raiding the Tomahawk Casino in Santa Claus suits.
Alan Silvestri
does what Jerry Goldsmith could not do, write a fakeout score for the first
couple of reels before the film properly begins (these parody scenes may be
clarified in the director’s cut—Frankenheimer’s film was
trimmed by twenty minutes).
The effect of
style is akin to 52 Pick-Up. The main parodistic material with its
set-pieces and apparatus ends in a burning heap at the bottom of a snowy cliff.
Reindeer Games opens like Sunset Blvd. on a dead man speaking in
a voiceover, not a Hollywood screenwriter floating face-down but Santa Claus
lying in the snow. It ends with wads of cash in rural mailboxes on Christmas
Day, and the return of the prodigal son.
The Lord works in
mysterious ways, the unrighteous man heaps up wealth for the righteous, and
there is a reason why one would rather see a Frankenheimer film than just about
anything else. Part of it is style, the work done by the camera or given to
capable, proficient actors, the rest of it is what is meant by all these signs
and wonders.
Much of the play,
as Hitchcock would say, is interested in comic divergences and alliances to do
with Boorman’s The Tailor of Panama, Antonioni’s The
Passenger and its antecedent, Sekely’s Hollow Triumph (The
Scar). These articulate Rudy’s dilemma among the dwarves, gunrunning
truckers who mistake him for Nick, the master con who used to be a guard at the
Tomahawk.
Doubtless the
significance is the surprising reference to Milestone’s inestimable Ocean’s
Eleven.
Ulmer’s Detour
is among the models.
Ambush
An irreproachable
point of technique reversing a gag of Ronin, the diamond courier and his
driver are beset on the road at night, in five or six minutes they arrive at the
Jewelry District in downtown Los Angeles.
The minute
deployment of action scenes to make a composite sequence is incredibly lush,
allongating the gag from Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, “I
ate it.”
Path to War
LBJ and his
Cabinet and the Joint Chiefs, who “did their best”.
A minute,
detailed analysis in which every scene has a structural purpose. The film
depicts 39 months of President Johnson’s elected term, from the inaugural
ball to his televised address refusing re-nomination.
A sympathetic and
yet critical portrayal of all the many personages is the remarkable
achievement, along with the highly accurate settings and so forth. The fluent
direction has been noted by reviewers, it explains or reflects the working
method in its reverse angles that are fresh views, and sequences that continue
in another room already seen through a doorway.
Thus every
personage is regarded in several perspectives, events move with a logical
consistency that is foreseen to some extent, a very nice metaphor.
The viewpoints
expressed are those of the participants, outside conclusions are avoided.