Prisoner of Paradise
Its very
clumsiness, particularly in the writing, is so very transparent, and its
subject so vast (he was evidently a genius), that in spite of the critics’
alarming ability to ignore what’s on the screen, Prisoner of Paradise
succeeds in being a faithful account of Kurt Gerron and his extraordinary
career.
For the blighters
of the press, I will recount some of the facts. You remember him as the fat
magician in The Blue Angel who pulled an egg out of Emil Jannings’ nose.
He studied medicine, was decorated in the First World War, went on the stage at
twenty-three, into movies that same year. Cabaret was his specialty, he was the
first to sing “Mack the Knife” in The Threepenny Opera. He was a film
star and then a director until the Nazi edict came down. He went to Paris, then
Amsterdam. From Westerbork he was sent to Theresienstadt, and there he was
ordered to direct Der Führer schenkt den Juden eine Stadt, after which
he died in Auschwitz.
“Paris was
naughty” in the Twenties, we are told, “Berlin was decadent.” This solecism is
recouped an hour or so later when swing music is similarly branded, only this
time by the Nazis. In a similar vein, it is also said that Gerron became a
director to gratify his ego. It’s a Canadian-British co-production, and the
British film industry is rather moribund.
Nevertheless,
footage and recordings show you what a wonderful performer Gerron is, and
doubtless (though it’s not saying much) he could have directed this better. The
tragedy of Kurt Gerron is that he was an artist who didn’t escape the net, and
not at all that he directed Hitler’s propaganda film at the point of a gun. A
film is a film, he knew, and twenty-three minutes of people’s happiness in 1944
was not too little for the sweat he poured over it, “he was a broken man” says
an eyewitness. Here, in footage from the film, you see them represented almost
as if life was going on as it ought. You see them, after all, is what I think
Gerron had in mind.
“He had a child’s
mind,” which has been said of Mozart. He satirized the Nazis in the Twenties,
and was made to pay for it in the Thirties. There you have satire as a weapon.
Pictures of children playing are pictures of children playing.
What is not
explained, really, is why precisely such a film should have been ordered by
Hitler. We are told that he wished to create a good impression on Switzerland
and Sweden, and that it was never shown there. I doubt it could have imposed
upon anyone’s credulity, or was meant to.
Kurt Gerron could
act and sing, and was a successful director. His moral dilemma at
Theresienstadt was that of the kapos, which was to live or die. I can’t
be sorry for a picture of the condemned as it were untrammeled as they ought,
it stands alongside other footage of the time as a sheer work of art for which
Gerron is ultimately responsible.
He forces his way
through the flimsy structure of Prisoner of Paradise in anecdotes and
descriptions by his contemporaries, in scenes from his films, in snippets of
songs. Another half-hour would have been welcome, more than that. “Vaguely
repellent,” says the solidly repulsive New York Post reviewer.
Brilliant, convivial, fatherly, industrious (“shamelessly prolific,” says the Boston
Globe), fluently comical (“boisterous,” again says the Boston Globe),
generous, proud (“hubris,” screams the New York Times), witty, and quite
humble when it came to finally asking Hollywood in earnest for a way out, which
was denied.
Why he stayed
after helping Peter Lorre out is unexplained here, except by conjecture. The
truth is that a top film star was hounded to the shores of Europe and then
forced to direct a concentration camp film, after which he was executed.
Hardest of all is TV Guide’s reviewer, who concludes that Gerron’s
actions were “traitorous,” which I should probably do if I wrote for TV
Guide.