Double Jeopardy
The ending casts
a light on the whole film which suggests the ultimate model might be Tom
Stoppard’s play Hapgood, anyway the allusion is suggested. That’s
the spy-thriller jest on wave/particle theory (and the Heisenberg Principle),
which depends for its solution on twins. And there’s that touching fight
from Dishonored Lady.
Whether or not
Beresford is up to this seems less significant than undertaking the composition
of it at all in the first place.
An
excessively complicated structure reveals the difficult perspective established
by the director on a screenplay consciously anchored in Capra. Beresford
secures the film with great sureness of technique to Capra’s disciple
George Seaton, and more specifically to Miracle on 34th Street,
which is about as rigorously fine as a film can be on the subject. He then,
incredibly, adds into the account for a further point of perspective the remake
of Seaton’s film, which puts his Fifties period drama squarely in the
mindset of contemporary Hollywood, such as it is and in more ways than one.
Harris in Pollock
took on the “dark side” biography for a further note, why should he
breast the breaking wave without making it into a formal element of the work?
Consequently,
there’s always a little more going on in Beresford’s film than
sometimes appears, until he cuts away to a boy kicking a ball and tracks to a
fine perspective of the Christian Brothers in Kilkenny, or introduces religious
characters into the drama as statuary at the nuns’ school where the title
character is sent by the State. “Priest-ridden” Ireland is the
theme, and it comes very near to Fanny and Alexander, but the nearest
thing to a villain is the “gobshite” Minister of Education who
won’t hear appeals to his ruling in the case of an abandoned husband left
with three children. The case is very gradually elevated from the violence and
keening of a ne’er-do-well to judiciously brave and bold steps that
culminate in Supreme Court action on constitutional grounds.
The
multiplicitous perspective is capable of adducing great surprises, as when the
mother-in-law drops years of hostile silence to exclaim from the gallery
against a punishing nun that it were better the girl
were with her father than this, and she’ll see her outside. The majesty
of the law comes its way down corridors full of intrigue and inertia, making a
settled appearance, after testimony is heard which includes little
Evelyn’s sober prayer for the furtherance of wisdom in the Irish State.
In the end,
Beresford’s approach to the case adds an all but unforeseeable element of
our own time as stylistic touches to the historical account so that the peculiar
sting of it should not be lost, evidently to no avail with the great public and
the great critics.