The Adventure of
Sherlock Holmes’ Smarter Brother
Precisely, and that is part of the joke, the film to be expected
from the original author of Young Frankenstein.
The World’s
Greatest Lover
Imperishable scenes, attended by Carl Ballantine, as though vaudeville
could be nonplussed. Fellini with a bit of flavor, not out of Cinecittŕ but
Hollywoodland.
The Woman in Red
The particular demon invading the peace of Ted Pierce’s
mind re-enacts the famous scene from The Seven Year Itch in an
underground garage, and dressed all in red. She (Kelly LeBrock) even does it
twice, so our boy can’t miss the point.
He’s an adman, she’s an agency model. He telephones
her across the office but gets the very aggressively plain Ms. Milner (Gilda
Radner) by mistake without knowing it. He sets up a date which rather than
going awry doesn’t come off at all.
That little contretemps has its revenges, and meanwhile Wilder
branches out in a wide view of Pierce’s coterie, three chums (Joseph
Bologna, Michael Huddleston, Charles Grodin): a married philanderer, a married
woman’s lover, and the other other man.
Pierce is a married man all the way, so his steps toward
straying are crafty and clumsy. He changes his look and is received in the
boardroom with a staring POV like Buddy Love. Caught shaving fully-dressed for
a nighttime rendezvous, he replies backwards from Humbert Humbert that his
wife’s not crazy, so he is.
In the clinches there is the betrayal of the noisy water bed,
like Emerson in The Stranger: “When you commit a crime...”
The scene has amusing lyrics:
|
Baby let’s just take off our clothes |
The photo session (model as Bo-Peep) has another song with
another singer (Dionne Warwick) in three or four of her finest minutes.
Wilder’s best shot has him perched on a high ledge in a
bathrobe as a news crew sets up a camera in a long shot that zooms right in to
a close-up seen on TV around the dining room table in his home. The conclusion
puts down a vaudeville five for Blake Edwards’ 10
and doubles it with the superb final jest.
Haunted Honeymoon
“Humor and horror make an uneasy combination.”
(Walter Benjamin, New York Times) A film that sorely tries the
intellectual capacities of the Times is, as I’m sure you’ll
agree, perhaps such a commonplace as to be truly frightening, yet there’s
something funny about it for all that, but why equivocate? Byron felt so
strongly that the Quarterly Review killed Keats, he wrote verses
proclaiming the deed. And who, now, reads the Quarterly Review?
The strange, bizarre murder at the outset is an error revealed
near the end. After the credits, during which John Morris rises to new heights,
Wilder effortlessly re-creates a New York radio broadcast. This week’s
episode of Manhattan Mystery Theatre also bears the title “Haunted
Honeymoon”. For once, the sound effects man is not a figure of fun.
He’s an artist, like all the rest: the deep-voiced announcer, the
well-trained actors (Radner’s dramatic voice is a skilled attunement,
added to her Thirties character voice). The script takes on a life of its
own...
The main framework is established as radio at its highest. The
cinematic equivalent is built of several well-known models, and some
unfamiliar. The bed panel from Frank Strayer’s The Monster Walks, the
arm-holding-candelabra from Cocteau’s La Belle et la Bęte, his
passage through glass, Dreyer’s Vampyr (the viewing window in the
premature coffin).
There are jokes that are not jokes. Wilder mentions a widower.
“Widower than what?” asks Bryan Pringle as Pfister, the butler.
“A widow man?” The pun is on little, Pfister is hard of
hearing.
The psychological component is breathtaking in its virtuosity
and fulfillment on any number of levels. Of course, it’s all gag material
finally, but played so expertly.
The direction hews close enough to its models to diligently give
one a start occasionally, but is also modern and flexible enough to allow Dom
DeLuise as Aunt Kate to relieve his excruciatingly funny number with an
occasional hoot. All of the performances are very carefully rendered, and then
filmed to give a nuance of freedom. Peter Vaughan’s Transatlantic accent
is a welcome touch.
It consoles one in a way to see a work of genius savaged like
Elliot Silverstein’s Nightmare Honeymoon, considering the caliber
of the critics and the wispy tastes of the public. So many times over the past
twenty years, films advancing the art of cinema have met with sheer
incomprehension, it’s no wonder the Oscars are given out in a shopping
mall.
The radio drama is still a vital thing, and in a certain sense
Wilder may be said to have fashioned a dithyramb expounding its imaginative
mysteries. The impressive set is a well-filmed castle, in which the classic
psychological situation of pre-nuptial jitters is explored from every possible
angle. This is the real source of the comedy and of the film (as it was of D.O.A.,
for example) and not, as the critics supposed, a satirical impulse toward films
which knew exactly what they were doing.
There is a werewolf, and a plot to scare the bridegroom out of
his stammering w’s, and a changed will, with plenty of bizarrerie
solidly formed and yet transparent as nicely-observed comedy. To describe it at
all is to diminish the evanescence and resonance of it. In the end, the happy
honeymooners depart the broadcast, and the werewolf turns to look at the
camera, then walks down the road after them as double doors slowly shut behind
him like a slitted version of an iris-out.
It’s a good thing to see these heebie-jeebies pooh-poohed
as trite, old hat, etc. That is partly Wilder’s position toward them as
well. He pursues his floating bride to an open grave with an arm and a veil
protruding from it, and later finds the arm a detachable prop, the ever-present
lightning a stage effect. But he sees more than the critics, and the public
overlooked in its haste a film it will come to admire.
The simple truth is that Wilder understands more about the
cinema, is far more learned in its precedents and modes, and has a much better
sense of humor than the critics. It shouldn’t have to be said, but in the
age of communication there is still much that is little understood.
Postmodernity is unmistakably a step to the rear, and that’s why even in
this latter day the columnist Anne Taylor Fleming lamented her son becoming an
artist, since after all Van Gogh failed to sell but one measly wee picture.